Difference between revisions of "Blasting Spacers for Our Genome"
Karicheson (talk | contribs) (→Blasting Spacers) |
Karicheson (talk | contribs) (→Blasting Spacers) |
||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
Spacer Ten: ACTCACTGGATTATGACCCCTACAACGAGGGCGTCA | Spacer Ten: ACTCACTGGATTATGACCCCTACAACGAGGGCGTCA | ||
| − | [[Image: | + | No significant hits. . . lowest E-value is 1.5 |
| + | |||
| + | Spacer Eleven: GGATCTCGATCGTTGTAGTATCCATAGCTGCTATACC | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Image:spacerEleven.jpg]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | Spacer Twelve: | ||
Revision as of 17:32, 5 November 2009
Blasting Spacers
CRISPR one results from CRISPR finder are shown below. I blasted all of the spacers using the nr/nt database and the results are shown below.
Spacer One: TGCGTCGTCCGGTGGCCGTCAATAAATGTCGCAAGGG
Matches by chance!
Spacer Two: TCCTACGACCTCGTCGGCGTCAACGGCTGGCCCGA
Spacer Three: CACCCTACAACAGGTGAAATCTACCAGACAAAAGA
Spacer Four: TCACCCAAGCGCAAGCAACAGCTGATCGAGGACCTG
Spacer Five: GCGACGGCGGCCAGTTCCGCGAGGGCGGGAAGGTCC
This image is only part of it. . .
NOTE: lots of hits from each organism- indicates that multiple parts have been incorporated into our species' spacers. . . interesting to study what genes have been inserted
Spacer Six: TGCGAGTGTTGCGGGGAACCGACTCGGGTAGGCCAG
No viral insertions in this spacer
Spacer Seven: ACGGTTTCGCTACCACCATCGCCACCAGCAACTGCCG
Spacer Eight: GACGAGTATGCCAACCGGCTCGTGAGCGGGCGC
E-values not good- no significant hits!
Spacer Nine: TGGTAGGCGTCGTAGGTGTTCGTGGCGAGCGTGTC
Spacer Ten: ACTCACTGGATTATGACCCCTACAACGAGGGCGTCA
No significant hits. . . lowest E-value is 1.5
Spacer Eleven: GGATCTCGATCGTTGTAGTATCCATAGCTGCTATACC
Spacer Twelve:
