Difference between revisions of "Designing XOR Gates - two campus approach"
From GcatWiki
MaCampbell (talk | contribs) |
MaCampbell (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Davidson Approach | Davidson Approach | ||
| − | Here is an idea Malcolm had. <br> | + | '''Here is an idea Malcolm had. <br> |
| − | Please look at this and ask questions and find holes in it now so we don't waste time building something that won't work.<br> | + | Please look at this and ask questions and find holes in it now so we don't waste time building something that won't work.'''<br> |
== XOR Biological Design == | == XOR Biological Design == | ||
<center> [[Image:XOR_AMC1.jpg]]<br></center> | <center> [[Image:XOR_AMC1.jpg]]<br></center> | ||
Revision as of 19:52, 12 June 2008
Davidson Approach
Here is an idea Malcolm had.
Please look at this and ask questions and find holes in it now so we don't waste time building something that won't work.
XOR Biological Design
The idea is to have two mirrored halves of the system. One is regulated by AI-1 and the other by AI-2. There is a potential problem in that the Lux half is more likely to get positive feedback than the Las half. This MAY not be a problem because 0/0 is leaky so we put a weak RBS to minimize leaky protein production. Also, if we add AI-2 and AI-1 is produced by leak, then the entire system shuts down.
Ampicillin Communication: time delayed cell growth
Growth Layouts
MWSU Approach
