Difference between revisions of "General Questions"

From GcatWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
A: No, let's stick to our pre-marked genes. There are many ATGs in a genome, and many possible SD sequences. But if the ORF does not code for anything real, it is a red herring. <br>
 
A: No, let's stick to our pre-marked genes. There are many ATGs in a genome, and many possible SD sequences. But if the ORF does not code for anything real, it is a red herring. <br>
 +
 +
''Alternative ORFs''' <br>
 +
Q: What if there's a possible Shine-Dalgarno sequence and start codon on the opposing strand in the middle of the gene you're working on? Do you assume that the computer has already marked it as a possible gene or do youhave to examine it as well? <br>
 +
 +
A: No, let's stick to our pre-marked genes. There are many ATGs in a genome, and many possible SD sequences. But if the ORF does not code for anything real, it is a red herring. <br>
 +
<br>
 +
 +
Q: How do we rate our judgment calls? Can we indicate confidence levels?<br>
 +
 +
A:Confidence levels (listed low to high)
 +
#'''Hypothetical protein''': choose if selected "hypothetical protein" under "gene product"<br>
 +
#'''Conserved hypothetical protein''':  choose if selected "conserved hypothetical protein" under "gene product"<br>
 +
*Not enough info to select "Family Membership" or "Function unclear"
 +
*no domains identified
 +
*no family membership)<br>
 +
#'''Family membership''':  Choose if conserved hypothetical protein identified via PFam or TIGRfam as belonging to a protein family but function and specificity are unclear.<br>
 +
#'''Function unclear''':  Choose if
 +
*protein domain is identified
 +
*protein function is unclear
 +
*if "putative" or "possible" or "predicted" occur in all the significant Tigrfam, COG, or PFAM names<br>
 +
#'''Specificity unclear''':  Choose if only more general information on the function of a protein family is available
 +
E.g., ABC transporter (but can't predict substrate)
 +
E.g., Histidine kinase (but can't predict target response regulator)
 +
High confidence in function and specificity:  Choose if all significant observations agree with each other
 +
*Clear function
 +
*Clear specificity

Revision as of 15:33, 11 September 2008

Alternative ORFs
Q: What if there's a possible Shine-Dalgarno sequence and start codon on the opposing strand in the middle of the gene you're working on? Do you assume that the computer has already marked it as a possible gene or do youhave to examine it as well?

A: No, let's stick to our pre-marked genes. There are many ATGs in a genome, and many possible SD sequences. But if the ORF does not code for anything real, it is a red herring.

Alternative ORFs'
Q: What if there's a possible Shine-Dalgarno sequence and start codon on the opposing strand in the middle of the gene you're working on? Do you assume that the computer has already marked it as a possible gene or do youhave to examine it as well?

A: No, let's stick to our pre-marked genes. There are many ATGs in a genome, and many possible SD sequences. But if the ORF does not code for anything real, it is a red herring.

Q: How do we rate our judgment calls? Can we indicate confidence levels?

A:Confidence levels (listed low to high)

  1. Hypothetical protein: choose if selected "hypothetical protein" under "gene product"
  2. Conserved hypothetical protein: choose if selected "conserved hypothetical protein" under "gene product"
  • Not enough info to select "Family Membership" or "Function unclear"
  • no domains identified
  • no family membership)
  1. Family membership: Choose if conserved hypothetical protein identified via PFam or TIGRfam as belonging to a protein family but function and specificity are unclear.
  2. Function unclear: Choose if
  • protein domain is identified
  • protein function is unclear
  • if "putative" or "possible" or "predicted" occur in all the significant Tigrfam, COG, or PFAM names
  1. Specificity unclear: Choose if only more general information on the function of a protein family is available

E.g., ABC transporter (but can't predict substrate) E.g., Histidine kinase (but can't predict target response regulator) High confidence in function and specificity: Choose if all significant observations agree with each other

  • Clear function
  • Clear specificity