Difference between revisions of "General Questions"

From GcatWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 23: Line 23:
 
**protein function is unclear
 
**protein function is unclear
 
**if "putative" or "possible" or "predicted" occur in all the significant Tigrfam, COG, or PFAM names<br>
 
**if "putative" or "possible" or "predicted" occur in all the significant Tigrfam, COG, or PFAM names<br>
*'''Specificity unclear''':  Choose if only more general information on the function of a protein family is available e.g., ABC transporter (but can't predict substrate) e.g., Histidine kinase (but can't predict target response regulator)
+
*'''Specificity unclear''':  Choose if only more general information on the function of a protein family is available  
High confidence in function and specificity:  Choose if all significant observations agree with each other
+
**e.g., ABC transporter (but can't predict substrate)  
 +
**e.g., Histidine kinase (but can't predict target response regulator)
 +
*'''High confidence in function and specificity''':  Choose if all significant observations agree with each other
 
**Clear function
 
**Clear function
 
**Clear specificity
 
**Clear specificity

Latest revision as of 15:36, 11 September 2008

Alternative ORFs
Q: What if there's a possible Shine-Dalgarno sequence and start codon on the opposing strand in the middle of the gene you're working on? Do you assume that the computer has already marked it as a possible gene or do youhave to examine it as well?

A: No, let's stick to our pre-marked genes. There are many ATGs in a genome, and many possible SD sequences. But if the ORF does not code for anything real, it is a red herring.

Alternative ORFs'
Q: What if there's a possible Shine-Dalgarno sequence and start codon on the opposing strand in the middle of the gene you're working on? Do you assume that the computer has already marked it as a possible gene or do youhave to examine it as well?

A: No, let's stick to our pre-marked genes. There are many ATGs in a genome, and many possible SD sequences. But if the ORF does not code for anything real, it is a red herring.

Q: How do we rate our judgment calls? Can we indicate confidence levels?

A:Confidence levels (listed low to high)

  • Hypothetical protein: choose if selected "hypothetical protein" under "gene product"
  • Conserved hypothetical protein: choose if selected "conserved hypothetical protein" under "gene product"
    • Not enough info to select "Family Membership" or "Function unclear"
    • no domains identified
    • no family membership)
  • Family membership: Choose if conserved hypothetical protein identified via PFam or TIGRfam as belonging to a protein family but function and specificity are unclear.
  • Function unclear: Choose if
    • protein domain is identified
    • protein function is unclear
    • if "putative" or "possible" or "predicted" occur in all the significant Tigrfam, COG, or PFAM names
  • Specificity unclear: Choose if only more general information on the function of a protein family is available
    • e.g., ABC transporter (but can't predict substrate)
    • e.g., Histidine kinase (but can't predict target response regulator)
  • High confidence in function and specificity: Choose if all significant observations agree with each other
    • Clear function
    • Clear specificity