Difference between revisions of "Genome Assembly Project: Leland Taylor '12"

From GcatWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Useful Links)
(Useful Links)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Useful Links ==
 
== Useful Links ==
http://phagesdb.org/
+
http://phagesdb.org/ - phage database. Assembled versions of the raw files we have are located here
  
http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/
+
http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/ - UMD bioinformatics center. Good open source programs. Also includes AMOS
 +
 
 +
http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43 - a good list of assembly programs
  
 
== {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} ==
 
== {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} ==

Revision as of 14:59, 23 May 2011

Useful Links

http://phagesdb.org/ - phage database. Assembled versions of the raw files we have are located here

http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/ - UMD bioinformatics center. Good open source programs. Also includes AMOS

http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43 - a good list of assembly programs

November 21 2024

Kingsford, C., Schatz, M.C. & Pop, M. Assembly complexity of prokaryotic genomes using short reads. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 21 (2010).

Notes

  • Use De Brujin graphs to estimate "completeness" of genomes assembled via de novo assembly
  • Lists compression techniques and the order to employ them
  • Can use this method to compute N50
    • N50 = the length of the largest contig (m) such that at least 50% of genome covered by contigs of size >= m.
    • A higher N50 score usually correlates to a more "correct" genome
  • Regardless of correctness of genome, for nearly all read sizes (1000nt > size > 25nt), 85%+ of genes accurately identified (85% is for 25nt reads).

Thoughts

  • Look for assembler that uses De Brujin graph?
  • This paper showed how to get an upper limit of correctness of genome. Compare several existing de novo assemblers using the methods here as comparison.
  • Is it possible to get the code used in this project?


Pop, M. Genome assembly reborn: recent computational challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics 10, 354-366 (2009).

Notes

Thoughts