Difference between revisions of "Genome Assembly Project: Leland Taylor '12"

Revision as of 15:16, 23 May 2011

Useful Links

http://phagesdb.org/ - phage database. Assembled versions of the raw files we have are located here

http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/ - UMD bioinformatics center. Good open source programs. Also includes AMOS

http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=43 - a good list of assembly programs

November 21 2024

Kingsford, C., Schatz, M.C. & Pop, M. Assembly complexity of prokaryotic genomes using short reads. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 21 (2010).

Notes

• Use De Brujin graphs to estimate "completeness" of genomes assembled via de novo assembly
  • Find Eulerian path(s) in these graphs
  • Note the assumptions made in the paper
  • TOOL: Jellyfish - counts k-mers http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/software/jellyfish/
• Lists compression techniques and the order to employ them
• Can use this method to compute N50
  • N50 = the length of the largest contig (m) such that at least 50% of genome covered by contigs of size >= m.
  • A higher N50 score usually correlates to a more "correct" genome
• Regardless of correctness of genome, for nearly all read sizes (1000nt > size > 25nt), 85%+ of genes accurately identified (85% is for 25nt reads).

Thoughts

• Look for assembler that uses De Brujin graph?
• This paper showed how to get an upper limit of correctness of genome. Compare several existing de novo assemblers using the methods here as comparison.
• Is it possible to get the code used in this project?

Pop, M. Genome assembly reborn: recent computational challenges. Briefings in Bioinformatics 10, 354-366 (2009).

Notes

Thoughts

Basic Timeline

• 1st – 2nd Week
  • Learn how to manipulate and handle raw read files.
  • Familiarize myself with key sources listed above.
  • Write module to calculate fold coverage using genome size estimate and total size of all reads.
  • Write a prioritized list of features and goals for my program.
• 3rd – 6th week
  • Develop my program in modules according to the prioritized features.
  • Compare my program’s genome to previously assembled genomes from this raw data.
  • Quantify the accuracy of my genome by testing for the size of a predicted gap or feature in the genome to size of that actual segment of DNA in the blueberry genome.
  • Edit the program based on any issues encountered with the full data set.
• 7th – 10th week (Ending: July 29, 2011)
  • Finish wet-lab accuracy tests
  • Fine–tune the program based on any issues encountered with the full data set.
  • Attempt to assemble the “Meatball” phage genome.