Difference between revisions of "XOR gate design involving Omp system"
(→Is there any backwards activity?) |
(→Is there any backwards activity?) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
The first test will be done with Tet resistance placed upstream of both the pOmpC and pLux promoters because Tet resistance has been found to be a sensitive way to measure backwards activity in promoters. If Tet resistance is expressed from the backward activity of pOmpC, then RFP will be used, as this is a less sensitive test for backwards activity. | The first test will be done with Tet resistance placed upstream of both the pOmpC and pLux promoters because Tet resistance has been found to be a sensitive way to measure backwards activity in promoters. If Tet resistance is expressed from the backward activity of pOmpC, then RFP will be used, as this is a less sensitive test for backwards activity. | ||
| + | |||
[[Image:backwards activity pOmpC.jpg]] | [[Image:backwards activity pOmpC.jpg]] | ||
[[Image:backwards activity pLux.jpg]] | [[Image:backwards activity pLux.jpg]] | ||
Revision as of 18:16, 26 May 2009
Contents
[hide]The Omp system in nature
XOR gate design and concept
If all the components work as expected, the above construct will exhibit XOR gate properties. This design relies on a couple of assumptions:
1. When both inputs A (high osmolarity) and B (30C6), the activities of the two promoters should negate each other and no output should be produced.
2. When only one input is present (either high osmolarity or 30C6), the activity of the induced promoter should be able to reach the GFP gene despite the physical separation (the uninduced promoter) between the two components.
Testing the pOmpC promoter
Characterizing pOmpC
Is there any backwards activity?
Backwards activity in either pLux or pOmpC would be detrimental to the design of the XOR gate because an output would still be produced if both inputs are provided.
The first test will be done with Tet resistance placed upstream of both the pOmpC and pLux promoters because Tet resistance has been found to be a sensitive way to measure backwards activity in promoters. If Tet resistance is expressed from the backward activity of pOmpC, then RFP will be used, as this is a less sensitive test for backwards activity.
