Difference between revisions of "NHE Jan 26 Notes"
From GcatWiki
(Created page with "Nick Elder Group 2 intestines") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[Group 2 intestines]] | [[Group 2 intestines]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | In summary paper | ||
| + | *include both fastQC rounds (trimmed 4 bases) | ||
| + | *include papers we have read | ||
| + | *research plan | ||
| + | |||
| + | RSem is the program to correlate the RNA seqs with annotated genome | ||
| + | |||
| + | Paper: Rapid changes in gene expression.... | ||
| + | *listed specifici genes | ||
| + | *looked at early changes | ||
| + | *WNT pathway | ||
| + | *up regulation of growth and death factors | ||
| + | *at 6hr time point, the cascade is in full force | ||
| + | **at 30min, we want to identify which genes start the cascade | ||
| + | *still selling the idea that the python is the best model for studying GI genetic regulation and morphology | ||
| + | *do we have the same volume of reads? | ||
| + | *took RNA from both the mucosa and serosa of the small intestine. | ||
| + | **claimed that they didn't find significant difference in volume of sequncing between mucosa and cross section | ||
| + | **mucosa changes the most morphologically | ||
| + | ***because mucosa is where most of the 'action' happens, comparing it to a cross section doesn't seem to distinguish it from the serosa | ||
| + | ***what about the serosa? huh? | ||
| + | ***Figure 1. did they really do anything different from sampling the same tissue multiple times? | ||
| + | ****Figure 1 C. same tissues from two animals are more different than the mucosa vs cross section from the same animal. | ||
Revision as of 19:02, 26 January 2016
In summary paper
- include both fastQC rounds (trimmed 4 bases)
- include papers we have read
- research plan
RSem is the program to correlate the RNA seqs with annotated genome
Paper: Rapid changes in gene expression....
- listed specifici genes
- looked at early changes
- WNT pathway
- up regulation of growth and death factors
- at 6hr time point, the cascade is in full force
- at 30min, we want to identify which genes start the cascade
- still selling the idea that the python is the best model for studying GI genetic regulation and morphology
- do we have the same volume of reads?
- took RNA from both the mucosa and serosa of the small intestine.
- claimed that they didn't find significant difference in volume of sequncing between mucosa and cross section
- mucosa changes the most morphologically
- because mucosa is where most of the 'action' happens, comparing it to a cross section doesn't seem to distinguish it from the serosa
- what about the serosa? huh?
- Figure 1. did they really do anything different from sampling the same tissue multiple times?
- Figure 1 C. same tissues from two animals are more different than the mucosa vs cross section from the same animal.
