Difference between revisions of "Emilie Uffman"
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Filtered data on galaxy to remove data with 'NA' | Filtered data on galaxy to remove data with 'NA' | ||
-skip 0 header line- | -skip 0 header line- | ||
+ | Only retained 70.41% of data when filtering to remove 'NA' | ||
Copied data to excel and use shortcut to removal decimals without rounding | Copied data to excel and use shortcut to removal decimals without rounding | ||
Line 31: | Line 32: | ||
Copy (100lines of) data into MGI Database | Copy (100lines of) data into MGI Database | ||
− | + | http://www.informatics.jax.org/batch/summary#myDataTable=results%3D25%26startIndex%3D0 | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
'''Excel tools:''' | '''Excel tools:''' | ||
Truncate numbers in excel: =left (A1, 18) | Truncate numbers in excel: =left (A1, 18) |
Revision as of 17:45, 7 February 2017
Comparison of maternal trisomy and disomy (CB131,126,117,125,122,121) with Paternal trisomy and disomy (CB091,089,087,093,100,103)
-the limited variation in paternal disomy and trisomy is conserved
-maternal still has variation
-there is no clear divide between gender along PC1--what does this mean?
Sorting of paternal trisomy data(Emilie) and maternal trisomy data (Jon):
Use galaxy sort tool to sort p-value in ascending order
Why is it that for many of the data there is a base mean and all statistics but no p-value?
ENSMUST00000000674.12 Base mean: 8.06384358972545 LogFC: 0.0460016853044759 Std Error: 0.0883691926491015 Wald-Stats: 0.520562471212569 P-value: NA P-adjusted: N
- See Jon's notes for information on question**
Filtered data on galaxy to remove data with 'NA' -skip 0 header line- Only retained 70.41% of data when filtering to remove 'NA'
Copied data to excel and use shortcut to removal decimals without rounding
Copy (100lines of) data into MGI Database
http://www.informatics.jax.org/batch/summary#myDataTable=results%3D25%26startIndex%3D0
Excel tools: Truncate numbers in excel: =left (A1, 18)